PDA

View Full Version : Tournament suggestion



jahil
09-25-13, 04:48 AM
Can anyone tell me how the tournament mechanics work? Because if it is only to become the winner with the highest number of crowns it will be only beneficial those who are on top.... If this is so... I suggest that the tournament winner should have the highest win-loss crown record to be fair to everyone...what do you reckon mods?

Jordieggg
09-25-13, 03:04 PM
If the tournament was to be awarded to the person who won the most crowns during the tournament all people would have to do is drop most of their crowns before the start of the tournament and then win them back very quickly. This would make it extremely unfair on new players as the ones doing this would have upgraded their bases and troops to the max. As it stands the ones fighting it out to win have all fought hard to get to the top ranks over a long time and they all deserve to be the ones fighting it out.

jahil
09-25-13, 03:16 PM
If the tournament was to be awarded to the person who won the most crowns during the tournament all people would have to do is drop most of their crowns before the start of the tournament and then win them back very quickly. This would make it extremely unfair on new players as the ones doing this would have upgraded their bases and troops to the max. As it stands the ones fighting it out to win have all fought hard to get to the top ranks over a long time and they all deserve to be the ones fighting it out.

Win-loose record... If they loose on purpose they'll have nothing to show for it... Example... 100 wins but lost 98(on purpose) they only have 2 cumulative crowns for the duration...

Then to be able not to exploit this... Start the tournament right after it ends.... Then you will have no time crowndropping....

MediusSyberia
09-25-13, 09:27 PM
Disagree. The top player should be the one who has gotten the most crowns (as long as they got those crowns legitimately *cough*).

All this idea will do is cause everyone to attack all the weak players over and over again and the person with the most wins will just be the person with the most time of their hands to attack the highest number of weak players to get a lot of wins.

The system is fine as is... the more crowns you have the harder it is to earn them, the more crowns you can lose and the slower crown collecting becomes. If you want more crowns in the top 5 you basically have to attack the other top 5 because just about everyone else would only give you 1 or 2 crowns for a win. This is the way it should be... the top players either attacking either other to move ahead or risking lots to attack players slightly lower than them while most players won't give them anything anymore.

jahil
09-25-13, 09:46 PM
Disagree. The top player should be the one who has gotten the most crowns (as long as they got those crowns legitimately *cough*).

All this idea will do is cause everyone to attack all the weak players over and over again and the person with the most wins will just be the person with the most time of their hands to attack the highest number of weak players to get a lot of wins.

The system is fine as is... the more crowns you have the harder it is to earn them, the more crowns you can lose and the slower crown collecting becomes. If you want more crowns in the top 5 you basically have to attack the other top 5 because just about everyone else would only give you 1 or 2 crowns for a win. This is the way it should be... the top players either attacking either other to move ahead or risking lots to attack players slightly lower than them while most players won't give them anything anymore.

The idea is, to entice everyone to stay and play the game.... Not interest those only in the top 10... Oh by the way... Attacking the weak??? Isnt that what is really happening with the top 10? They are attacking weaker ones to advance their crown counts... Is 1 and 2 really attacking each other? Geesh...

Firemocha should be happy for those giving time playing this game attacking to gain crowns...isnt that how they make money out of those people? Lol

MediusSyberia
09-25-13, 10:02 PM
The idea is, to entice everyone to stay and play the game.... Not interest those only in the top 10... Oh by the way... Attacking the weak??? Isnt that what is really happening with the top 10? They are attacking weaker ones to advance their crown counts... Is 1 and 2 really attacking each other? Geesh...

Firemocha should be happy for those giving time playing this game attacking to gain crowns...isnt that how they make money out of those people? Lol

Lol actually a lot of the top 10 (well top 5 anyway) isn't attacking anyone anymore but waiting for defenses. Once you have 300 more crowns than someone you can't win any crowns vs them on an attack so there's no point attacking. But you still win 1 crown on defensive so you just sit and wait for people to try steal your resources and take easy crowns off them with defensive wins.

So no a lot of the top 10 aren't attacking the very weak players. But if you change the tournament to be about how many wins vs losses you have then I can guarantee you probably the entire top 10 would start attacking level 20 bases over and over again (not because they will win any crowns or get many resources but because they can win the tournament & free gems by doing so).

I still believe the highest ranked player should be the strongest player.