Storm8 Community Forums  

Go Back   Storm8 Community Forums > World War > World War Discussions
Don't have a Storm8 Account yet?
Forgot your username or password?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2009, 12:09 AM
Vorpal Vorpal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 192
Default Vorpal's Comprehensive Spreadsheet

Since my spreadsheet hasn't been updated in forever, here's an alternative from SKT168 and Supervolcano. A brief quote explains.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Supervolcano View Post
Correct.

Vorpal has too many other things on his mind (and has for quite some time).

He will not be updating his spreadsheet anytime soon.

As a result, Vorpal has given me permission to post the link to SKT168's Spreadsheet, which is completely up-to-date (including today's changes).

------------------------------------------------

World War Cheat Sheet v5.1
by SKT168 w/ contributions from Supervolcano


http://www.immoforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1159


v5.1 --- 6/29/2010
  • Added the 15 new Regular Units, fixed all unit price & upkeep values, fixed all building prices, and fixed mission payouts from Storm8's 6/29/2010 update.
  • Added the 18 new Unmarked Shipments & Heroic Reinforcements that we've found since one of Storm8's May 2010 updates.
  • File was modified by Supervolcano instead of SKT168 due to his recent absence from the forum.
...And here's a link to a user-made update of my spreadsheet:

http://forums.storm8.com/showthread.php?t=15203


...And here's the rest of my original post.


Hey, everyone.

Over the last several weeks I've been making my own excel spreadsheet. It started off as a small personal project, but slowly grew into something larger.

I'm fairly certain that this spreadsheet does more than any other spreadsheet that I've seen posted anywhere.


Currently, the spreadsheet is only available in .xlsx format. It cannot be converted to .xls because of some of the formulas and formatting used. I'm also messing around with google docs, but I haven't figured that part out yet.


Current Version:

Version 2.100:

This version contains only the updated units information, and not updated mission information!

Parts of the Infrastructure and Fortifications tabs have been updated with Pengbo's formulas. I'm not exactly sure where they will work better, but I trust his knowledge of excel.


Thanks to Supervolcano, Pengbo and Neeboopride for their help and contributions with this update!

Here is the update link:

http://www.mediafire.com/file/dnwmwz...WW_V2.100.xlsx



Old Versions::


Version 2.000:

Version 2 contains minor changes and updated building information.

http://www.mediafire.com/file/lgydng...WW_V2.000.xlsx


Version 1.000:

http://www.mediafire.com/file/jbwgnk...WW_V1.000.xlsx



In addition, special thanks go out to those who helped compile data and contributed ideas.

Thanks to Neeboopride, Pengbo, Supervolcano, SKT168, and unison999!


Enjoy,

Vorpal

Last edited by Vorpal; 07-01-2010 at 01:11 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-17-2009, 11:43 PM
noob's Avatar
noob noob is offline
Storm8 Employee
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: California
Posts: 63
Default

All posts from here on must be on topic.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-18-2009, 06:49 AM
Ilc72 Ilc72 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 112
Default Update

Just wanted to say a great thank you to Vorpal and the other contributors.

I really like the new look, but if its possible would recommend some modifications.
  1. On the Stats page the new buildings don't seem to be taken into account?
  2. The mission rewards, e.g. timer reductions for energy, PGM's, and possibly the ammo reduction item should be taken into account.
  3. Personally I think the missions page should be simplified, since the last few game updates it is easy to see what the requirements are and purchase the required units direct from the mission screen. I would just have a simple table of mission names and loots. You could even just list the pre-requisite loot for the other missions.
  4. Could the conditional formatting rules not be simplified? Do the new options (e.g. top/bottom numbers in a cell range) not work in earlier versions of Excel?

Thanks once again for all your efforts and if I can help in anyway let me know.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-18-2009, 06:59 AM
Vorpal Vorpal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by noob View Post
All posts from here on must be on topic.
Thank-you for cleaning up the thread!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ilc72 View Post
Just wanted to say a great thank you to Vorpal and the other contributors.

I really like the new look, but if its possible would recommend some modifications.
  1. On the Stats page the new buildings don't seem to be taken into account?
  2. The mission rewards, e.g. timer reductions for energy, PGM's, and possibly the ammo reduction item should be taken into account.
  3. Personally I think the missions page should be simplified, since the last few game updates it is easy to see what the requirements are and purchase the required units direct from the mission screen. I would just have a simple table of mission names and loots. You could even just list the pre-requisite loot for the other missions.
  4. Could the conditional formatting rules not be simplified? Do the new options (e.g. top/bottom numbers in a cell range) not work in earlier versions of Excel?

Thanks once again for all your efforts and if I can help in anyway let me know.
Thank you for your compliments and suggestions.

Yes, your first point has been brought to my attention. It will be fixed with the next update.

I haven't gotten to updating all of the mission data yet. When I do, I will account for the skill points and bonuses that are received from mission mastery.

I am not likely to reduce the complexity of the missions tab - it is easier for a user to hide or ignore some information than to not have it present at all.

I'm not sure about the conditional formatting rules used in the missions tab at this moment. I will look at it again when I update - what is there right now is probably what was easiest or fastest to implement at the time.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-20-2009, 12:50 PM
Unregistered
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Automated Sentry Gun input doesn't work

Thanks for the spreadsheet! Great work!
Just one problem: When you input 'Automated Sentry Gun' it does not add 75 to your defense. It's like it doesn't even matter when you add a new one.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-20-2009, 01:22 PM
Vorpal Vorpal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Unregistered View Post
Thanks for the spreadsheet! Great work!
Just one problem: When you input 'Automated Sentry Gun' it does not add 75 to your defense. It's like it doesn't even matter when you add a new one.

Yup... That is due to the previously mentioned error. It will be fixed as soon as I have time to work on it and release an update. I will fix this before I release a missions update. (Sorry to those people waiting on the missions update.)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-21-2009, 02:05 PM
Boron Boron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Default

For those users with a Mac, running iWork '09, here's a modified version of Vorpal's V1.0 spreadsheet, with some elements of V2.0 included to use with Numbers.

http://www.mediafire.com/boron - ignore the .xlsx version for the moment, needs some adjusting.
As soon as it's fixed, I'll edit this post.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-21-2009, 02:51 PM
Vorpal Vorpal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 192
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Boron View Post
For those users with a Mac, running iWork '09, here's a modified version of Vorpal's V1.0 spreadsheet, with some elements of V2.0 included to use with Numbers.

http://www.mediafire.com/boron - ignore the .xlsx version for the moment, needs some adjusting.
As soon as it's fixed, I'll edit this post.
While I'm all for trying to make things more widely compatible... I want it to be perfectly clear that I do not support or approve of these changes because they were made without my knowledge or participation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:36 AM
Boron Boron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 30
Default

Your comment there could be taken as one of a number of ways.....but if you've grabbed the .xlsx version hosted there, you'll notice I've not done much other than put a different emphasis on the number of sheets needed, and all the credits to yourself and others mentioned in your original spreadsheet, still remain.
It's not like I've tried to take credit for something I didn't do, but that which I have done.

So, with respect, I didn't see a need to contact you prior to modifying it for myself, and as there's been no .numbers version for those of us with iWork to draw upon, I've simply offered up one, which is merely a modestly revised/tweaked/spelling corrected version of yours.

They always say, imitation is the sincerest form of flattery - I hope you're looking at it as such, and not some form of plagiarism.

If there's any aspect you're concerned about, please feel free to PM me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-22-2009, 02:24 PM
Wrad Wrad is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 7
Default

I found a few minor errors. In the Units tab, for the Ground, Water, and Air portions, you did not extend the sum to the last row.

In Ground, the blue Offense, Defense, and Upkeep sums are inaccurate because the first two miss the bottom two rows, and the upkeep misses the bottom row. # Owned is also missing the bottom two rows.

Water is only missing the upkeep for the last row.

Air has all four of the columns short one row.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
calculator, comprehensive, dingdong, excel, pancakes, spreadsheet, vorpal, waffle?, whistle

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:44 PM.