Of course there's always Pros & Cons :o But it's fun sometime to have more option to get a dragon. & like I said we could always stay basic.
Printable View
So, I guess alot of time and effort and coding and whatnot was involved in this release. Thank you TL for spending, days, weeks, months coming up with this new concept or whatever you want to call it.
But,
Wouldn't it have been easier if you would have just sold the gemstone dragons for coins to android players? Really, how long would it have taken if you backspaced the word gold away and typed in coins?
That doesn't make sense. Many players have gemstone dragons. Are you going to make them homeless until their caretakers buy the new habitat?
Or is it just bred dragons that need special housing? No, that doesn't make sense, either. If the pink hybrid, Justice, can live in pink or red habitats, why can't Ruby live in gemstone or red habitats?
I can't update on the parity issues, but here are some answers to your other questions:
And really? Adding a new element to the gemstone dragons?!
Why not make them breedable using a gemstone dragon and a base type but make the result a non splitting base type dragon?
Several reasons: We want them to have their own tab in the market, we want Ruby to be able to produce gemstone babies (composite types don't break down unless they are a displayed type of a hybrid), we want players to be able to display their gemstone dragons in the gemstone habitat.
That way you didn't screw iOS players and made the gemstone dragons still pure base type dragons.
Why does this screw iOS players? Just because you have to get another Fire Dragon to have a pure red parent? I think that's fairly minor.